No I am not sorting massive results. My sort code was put in before the new sorting
functionality, which I haven't looked at yet. I haven't done any performance
comparisons as of yet. I also use HitCollector to restrict the number of results
retrieved to begin with. I have been meaning to look at the new sort code soon.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/25/04 10:39AM >>>
On May 25, 2004, at 9:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I solve this problem by using the HitCollector interface instead of
> the Hits interface and putting the hit information into my own
> SearchResult object which is then stuffed into a SortedSet. I can
> then easily resort as needed using the standard collection
> capabilities in Java.
>
> Using HitCollector is pretty straightforward to implement.
I'm assuming you are not sorting massive amounts of results with this
scheme?
Erik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
