Hi, >> Would you also want the filter itself available? >>
the filter is not so important for me, although I think that all the Filter/Query classes should make their contents available for postprocessing - setters are different, but why omit a getter in this context? Thank you for patching, Karsten -- Dr.-Ing. Karsten Konrad Head of Artificial Intelligence Lab Xtramind Technologies GmbH Stuhlsatzenhausweg 3 D-66123 Saarbr�cken Phone +49 (681) 3 02-51 13 Fax +49 (681) 3 02-51 09 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xtramind.com -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juni 2004 11:54 An: Lucene Developers List Betreff: Re: Minor Patch for FilteredQuery, contributor needed. Karsten - I received your private e-mail with the attachment (yes, mail to apache lists is filtered with most attachment types removed). I have added that getter. Would you also want the filter itself available? Erik On Jun 18, 2004, at 4:58 AM, Karsten Konrad wrote: > > Hi, > > while trying out Maik Schreibers highlighting package I > found that FilteredQuery is not supported -- there > is way to access the underlying unfiltered Query, and therefore no > highlighting framework can collect the query terms. > > The code above adds the necessary public get-method to FilteredQuery > that will fix this; would any contributor to Lucene be so kind to > contribute it? > > Regards, > > Karsten > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
