DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30058>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30058 Lucene Search has poor cpu utilization on a 4-CPU machine [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-13 14:22 ------- Changed in CVS, thanks. I don't have an environment multi-threaded environment suitable for testing this change, to ensure it doesn't break when multiple-threads access FieldInfos. Maybe somebody else does? Regardless, it looks like there should be no threading issues, since the only users of FieldInfos are classes that themselves ought to be thread-safe. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
