DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19058>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19058 Reader getFieldNames returns an extra blank field name ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-10 21:23 ------- hi, there is another patch which should fix the problem of creating an empty field in the index. In the attachments there is the diff for FieldInfos class and difss for all dependend junit test cases. All junit tests pass fine. The only problem coming along with the patch is "luke". "luke" will not be able to open an index which was created with the patched lucene version. So these guys have to update their website and upgrade the new lucene version if committed. Maybe one of the lucene gurus can check if the provided change fits their needs or if i missed something. Nobody is perfect, but we are getting better day by day ;-) thx Bernhard --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
