Daniel Naber wrote:
Okay, but the Field.Text that takes a Reader doesn't seem to be a pure
convenience method, it makes use of the Reader, doesn't it? So to keep
that feature we probably need another public constructor just like the
current one with parameters name, value, and with two resp. three
enumerations, but it needs to take a Reader instead of a String. Is that
correct?
That's right. In particular I think we'll need:
public Field(String, Reader, Index); // Reader is never stored
public Field(String, Reader, Index, TermVector);
Doug
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
