DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31120>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31120 Move IndexReader.delete functionality to IndexWriter Summary: Move IndexReader.delete functionality to IndexWriter Product: Lucene Version: 1.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: Other Component: Index AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I propose moving the functionality of deleting a document from the index from IndexReader to IndexWriter, not only because because it is misleading that a reader modifies the index, but also because of the following problem: I have a website index, that should be updated but that should also be available for searching while updating. So I open an IndexReader for searching the index for a specific document and for deleting an outdated document from the index and I open an IndexWriter to add updated documents to the index. But there is a conflict between the locks of those two instances. If I want to update a document, I have to close the IndexWriter (because otherwise IndexReader could not obtain the lock for writing to the index) and the IndexReader (because it would complain if the index was modified since opening the reader). Then I have to create a new reader to delete the document from the index, and I have to close this reader as it does not release the write lock after deleting a document, so I would not be able to open an IndexWriter. And now I can open a fresh IndexWriter for adding the new document again and a fresh IndexReader for searching the index for the next document. You see, in the worst case (every document has been modified) the program is only opening and closing readers and writers all the time. If the IndexWriter deleted documents from the index, only this instance would need a write lock and I could only use one IndexReader and one IndexWriter for updating the whole index. If you know a better way to update the index, then let me know. Tilman Giese --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
