To be clear, you are proposing that we branch from the 1.4.1 tag in CVS and re-apply the patches below? I'm not opposed to that, if you volunteer to do the work.

I also agree with Otis that we should wait until we have a good solution to the Sort-related memory leak issue before we make a release.

Finally, I don't think this is urgent. Except for #4 below, these bugs don't break applications that worked prior 1.4. The Sort-related bugs are bugs in a new feature that has never worked correctly. In general we should urgently fix bugs in code that previously worked correctly. Fixing bugs in new features is important, but a lower priority.

Re #4: Did this fix a bug that was introduced in 1.4, or had the bug always been there?

Doug

Daniel Naber wrote:
This bug could actually lead to incorrect results. So what about releasing Lucene 1.4.2? Here is a list of fixes that could be part of that release:

-4. Fixed a bug in IndexWriter.addIndexes(IndexReader[] readers) that
    prevented deletion of obsolete segments. (Christoph Goller)

-13. Fixed bug #31241: Sorting could lead to incorrect results (documents
    missing, others duplicated) if the sort keys were not unique and there
    were more than 100 matches. (Daniel Naber)

-There was a compile problem with StandardTokenizer.jj because of an missing import.

Opinions?

Regards
 Daniel


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to