DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31785>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31785 DisjunctionScorer ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 20:36 ------- This looks great to me! Have you had a chance to benchmark it against BooleanScorer? I'd expect it to be faster with rare terms and slower with common terms. Differences might not be significant on small indexes. Also, have you thought about keeping track of which scorers matched, so that this could implement boolean logic? For example, if we kept an int or long bitmask with bits for prohibited and/or required sub-scorers, then this could fully replace BooleanQuery. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
