Date: 2004-11-24T14:46:32
Editor: HossMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wiki: Jakarta Lucene Wiki
Page: DateRangeQueries
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/DateRangeQueries
no comment
Change Log:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -20,3 +20,8 @@
||1906||6||
Erik Hatcher also
wrote([http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg07016.html
message]): One more point... caching is done by the IndexReader used for the
search, so you will need to keep that instance (i.e. the IndexSearcher) around
to benefit from the caching.
+
+ == Using a Filter Instead ==
+ In many cases (I would argue: all cases) it doesn't make sense to Query on a
Range of Dates. More then likely what you really want to do is *Filter* on a
Range of Dates. Querying scores items based on the frequency of terms -- which
is something most people don't care about when dealing with dates, particularly
given the overhead involved. Consider using a RangeFilter (or possibly a
RangeFilter wrapped in a FilteredQuery) instead.
+
+ http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&by=thread&from=943115
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
