Murray, discussions are good because people participate and bring new ideas. Your time would be better spend if you create a new (diferent) logo.
I people don't like it they will have to say why or give some ideas and that would help to make better logo.
This is just what i think,
Lopes.
Murray Altheim wrote:
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
David Spencer wrote:
Doug Cutting wrote:
I don't feel too proprietary. Do folks prefer Murray's reworked Lucene logo or the original logo?
I'm sorry, but I prefer the orig. The new one seems too elongated to me.
Me too... I think the "e" in the new font is unreadable, and the new logo is too angular, the old one is more rotund at the edges, and the old "n" provides a nice break in the baseline...
OTOH, I always had this (intended, according to Doug) impression that the original logo belongs to the 60' era, and denotes something outdated, old. So perhaps this is a good opportunity to bring it into the new era... :
I'm not intending to put any fuss about this, but it's relatively simple to either change the aspect ratio of the current logo, or push the characters closer together. Changing the 'e' would be a bit more difficult, but not really a problem either. I could do this towards the mid- to latter part of next week if people were interested.
Murray
...................................................................... Murray Altheim http://kmi.open.ac.uk/people/murray/ Knowledge Media Institute The Open University, Milton Keynes, Bucks, MK7 6AA, UK .
Empty handed, holding a hoe, Walking, riding a water buffalo, A man is crossing over a bridge; The bridge, not the water, flows.
-- Mahasattva Fu, The Blue Cliff Record [96]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
