DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32921>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32921 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-05 19:21 ------- Created an attachment (id=13901) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13901&action=view) JUnit test case for SortedVIntList The only change needed to SortedVIntList to pass the tests is the "+ 1" in the BitSet constructor as Mark noted: public SortedVIntList(BitSet bits) { initBytes(); int lastInt = 0; int nextInt = bits.nextSetBit(lastInt); while (nextInt != -1) { add(nextInt, lastInt); lastInt = nextInt; nextInt = bits.nextSetBit(lastInt + 1); // correction here } resizeBytes(lastBytePos); } so I'm not attaching the corrected version. The test code suppresses the test BitSet test for some special cases: too large integers that cause too much memory used in the BitSet, and duplicates in the list of integers that cannot be represented in a BitSet. I'll try and not post untested code again :) Regards, and thanks again Mark, Paul Elschot -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
