DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32965>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32965 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #13910|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-08 14:38 ------- Created an attachment (id=13940) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13940&action=view) Reworked FilteredQuery to also use IterFilter Using both filter types required introducing some abstract inline superclasses for the Weight and the Scorer. The inline subclasses for the Scorer are a bit too large for good readability. All Lucene tests pass. This version always converts a BitSet filter to an IterFilter for testing. This conversion is done by an calling an the useIterFilter() method in the BitSet constructor. Leaving out this call provides backward compatible behaviour. All tests pass, with and without the call to useIterFilter(). Some tests from TestRangeFilter even show a reduced size for the SortedVIntList when compared to the BitSet. Regards, Paul Elschot -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
