DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33019>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33019 Summary: BooleanScorer can score documents in non increasing order Product: Lucene Version: CVS Nightly - Specify date in submission Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P1 Component: Search AssignedTo: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BugsThisDependsOn: 31785 OtherBugsDependingO 32965 nThis: This has been the subject of occasional discussions on lucene-dev since quite some time. Doug once called this "arguably a bug" so I'm giving a minor severity. It should be noted that this behaviour of BooleanScorer does not cause bugs in the current versions of Lucene. The main reason I'm entering it now is that it blocks the introduction of filters based on other more compact data structures than java.util.BitSet (see bug 32965). An alternative scorer for BooleanQuery is available that always scores documents in increasing document order (see bug 31785). It might also be possible to improve the current BooleanScorer to always score documents in increasing order. A somewhat related problem is that the current BooleanScorer does not implement skipTo(). Regards, Paul Elschot -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
