DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32999>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32999 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-10 19:47 ------- I think the plan (correct me if I'm wrong) is to fold the most useful of the sandbox items into the standard Lucene build tree when Lucene's code is moved to a top-level project. They'll still be packaged into separate jar file(s). Once this happens, javadocs could either be built in a separate tree, or, perhaps better yet, put them in separate javadoc group(s): http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/tooldocs/windows/javadoc.html#group For example, Nutch uses groups to separate the Core APIs from plugins: http://www.nutch.org/docs/api/overview-summary.html -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
