Dave has done great work pulling this together. However, the same comment is true for DistributingMultiFieldQueryParser. There is only 1 field, so both multi-field query parsers are equivalent to QueryParser.
Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 3:36 PM > To: Lucene Developers List > Subject: Re: single field code ready - Re: URL to compare 2 Similarity's > ready-- Re: Scoring benchmark evaluation. Was RE: How to proceed with > Bug 31841 - MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq() ? > > On Tuesday 08 February 2005 00:06, David Spencer wrote: > > > So, does this make sense and is it useful way of trying to evaluate > the > > Similarities? > > Is this the MultiFieldQueryParser from Lucene 1.4? Then it's "buggy" > anyway, so it probably doesn't make sense to test it. But even with the > current SVN version I don't see how it makes sense to use > MultiFieldQueryParser for searches on just one field. > > Regards > Daniel > > -- > http://www.danielnaber.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
