+1

--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The Incubator requires the Lucene PMC vote on whether to accept the 
> lucene4c codebase.
> 
> +1 from me.
> 
> Other Lucene PMC members - please cast your vote on this thread.
> 
>       Erik
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: "Cliff Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: February 17, 2005 5:12:36 AM EST
> > To: <general@incubator.apache.org>
> > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c
> > Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >
> > Garrett,
> >
> > You're right that all new code bases should come through the
> Incubator.
> > However, the appropriate PMC to vote on whether it should be
> accepted
> > into the incubator is the sponsoring PMC, which in this case
> appears to
> > be the Lucene PMC.  (The Incubator PMC does sponsor some projects,
> > usually the ones that are expected to eventually be their own TLP.)
> >
> > The Incubator PMC is responsible for supporting what comes in and 
> > voting
> > whether it is ready to graduate.  So, once the Lucene PMC votes to
> > incubate it, the Incubator PMC will help you figure out exactly
> what
> > needs to be done and will then vote on graduation.
> >
> > Hope that helps.
> >
> > Cliff
> >
> > On Monday, February 14, 2005 10:58 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> >
> >> On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:36 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if
> >>>> only to do the required IP checklist.
> >>>
> >>> Right.
> >>>
> >>> By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project?
> >>> The Lucene PMC could bring the codebase into their project and
> >>> register the IP stuff here w/ the incubator.
> >>
> >> Is there some precedent for this?  I'm not sure what is meant by
> >> "register the IP stuff here".  Could you elaborate on what this
> >> entails.
> >>
> >> I'd gladly bring the codebase into Lucene's repository if that is
> the
> >> consensus.  It was created entirely by Garrett and he's agreed to
> >> donate it, so the IP should be pretty clear cut.
> >>
> >>    Erik
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I hope I'm just misunderstanding, but this appears to be a
> proposal
> >>> to create a new project at the ASF called "Lucene4c"
> >>>
> >>> geir
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
> >>>>> incubation?  Or because it was a single developer, could he
> >>>>> contribute it directly to the Lucene project and bypass
> >>>>> incubation?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>         Erik
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Lucene4c is a port of the Lucene search engine from Java to C,
> >>>>>> using the Apache Portable Runtime library for portability.
> >>>>>> The project is far from complete, and code to date is
> >>>>>> primarily concerned with reading an existing Lucene index,
> >>>>>> which must be created with another Lucene implementation
> >>>>>> (currently only Java Lucene has been tested).  The plan is to
> >>>>>> complete support for the rest of the index format and then
> >>>>>> move on to implementing search functionality (beyond the
> >>>>>> current proof of concept code anyway). Once we've reached
> >>>>>> that point work will begin on actual indexing functionality
> >>>>>> so that Lucene4c can stand alone, without the use of another
> >>>>>> Lucene implementation for bootstrapping.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The project would be part of the new Lucene top leve project,
> >>>>>> and Erik Hatcher has offerred to serve as a sponsor.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> While I have yet to expand the community of developers
> >>>>>> further than myself, I am anxious to do so, and I expect to
> >>>>>> be able to draw both from people as of yet unassociated with
> >>>>>> Lucene who have expressed interest in such a project and from
> >>>>>> existing Lucene developers who have expressed interest in
> >>>>>> establishing cross-language compatibility tests for the
> >>>>>> various Lucene ports.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Lucene4c already has ties to existing ASF projects,
> >>>>>> particularly Lucene itself and APR.  Bringing it into the ASF
> >>>>>> would only strengthen those ties.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> More details, including where to get the current release or
> >>>>>> development versions of the code can be found at the Lucene4c
> >>>>>> web site at http://electricjellyfish.net/garrett/lucene4c/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -garrett
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> - -
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
> >>>>>> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
> >>>>> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >
> =====================================================================
> >>>> = =
> >>>>  Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]
> >>>>   http://www.jaguNET.com/ "There 10 types of people: those who
> >>>> read binary and everyone else."
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Geir Magnusson Jr                                 
> +1-203-665-6437
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to