> IMHO, for programmers new to Lucene that need to construct a query > (for example, from several fields of an Advanced Search field), it > will easier to learn a simple language for constructing queries > rather than learning the Query API (kind of the difference between > programming in Assembler or in C). And considering that we are > almost 80% there, I think it will be worth while. I think this is a solution in search of a problem. I'll lay decent odds that 90% of "programmers new to lucene" will be able to do everythin they need with the current query parser. By the time they start doing things that are complicated enough to require using the query parser, they will no longer be new to lucene. And the query API is really not that hard to learn. _______________________________________________ Lucene-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lucene-dev
- [Lucene-dev] Indexing lists of weighted terms Alex Murzaku
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Tal Dayan
- Re: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Brian Goetz
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Alex Murzaku
- Re: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Brian Goetz
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Tal Dayan
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Brian Goetz
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Doug Cutting
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Doug Cutting
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Tal Dayan
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Brian Goetz
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Scott Ganyo
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Tal Dayan
- Re: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Brian Goetz
- Re: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Brian Goetz
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Tal Dayan
- Re: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Brian Goetz
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Tal Dayan
- Re: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Brian Goetz
- RE: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Tal Dayan
- Re: [Lucene-dev] New QueryParser Brian Goetz
