Hi George
 
You may want to really consider this one. We were running tests indexing a 
dozen or two fields, and making this change made Lucene.NET almost 100x faster 
indexing. Yes, really that order of magnitude from a simple change.
 
I'm not sure if that's the only place we changed... Mark?
 
    Neil

________________________________

From: George Aroush (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 10/3/2006 6:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-8) Throwing an exception as a result of a 
normal situation is extremely bad in .net



    [ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-8?page=comments#action_12439702 ]
           
George Aroush commented on LUCENENET-8:
---------------------------------------

Hi,

I am all for making Lucene.Net faster.  At the same time, I want to preserve 
the compatibility of Lucene.Net with it's Java version..  If this throw was 
introduced in the .Net version only, then I would have made the change, but 
it's not -- Java Lucene has the same code.

I will post this JIRA issue to the Java mailing list and see what they have to 
say about it.  Who knows, they agree that it should be removed.

Regards,

-- George Aroush

> Throwing an exception as a result of a normal situation is extremely bad in 
> .net
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-8
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-8
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Task
>         Environment: Windows XP, Visual Studio 2003
>            Reporter: Jo Inge Arnes
>         Attachments: test.patch
>
>
> At the end of the FastCharStream.Refill() method, it says:
> int charsRead = input.Read(buffer, newPosition, buffer.Length - newPosition);
> if (charsRead <= 0)
>    throw new System.IO.IOException("read past eof");
> else
>    bufferLength += charsRead;
> When I run Lucene in the debugger, this causes an exception to be thrown all 
> the time.
> To me it looks like it is thrown as a result of a normal situation, not 
> because of some critical error.
> Is this correct?
> If this is the case, then the code is horrible. Throwing an exception in .NET 
> is extremely slow, and should never be thrown as a result of a normal 
> situation. I repeat: "extremely slow"

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       


Reply via email to