Glad to be of even the tiniest little bit of help. Thanks for fixing the zip. I'll download and check it out right away.
On 11/28/06, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good catch! And Thanks for being the first to download this release. I just check-in a new ZIP which has the right source code. -- George Aroush -----Original Message----- From: Jon Gohr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Lucene.Net 2.0 "beta" build 002 and Lucene.Net 1.9.1 "final" build 004 are released Hi, I downloaded the 1.9.1 build 004 zip from the apache site and was wondering if the correct zip package got released? The project file says Lucene.Net-1.9.rc1.csproj where the 1.9.1 build 003 says Lucene.Net-1.9.1.csproj. Most/All(?) of the file dates appear to be older than the build 003 file dates as well. Thanks for any clarification you can provide! On 11/27/06, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I just released Lucene.Net 2.0 and 1.9.1. Here are the details for > each of those releases: > > Lucene.Net.2.0 build 002 "Beta" > - Lucene.Net.Demo.SearchFiles.cs -- parted new code > - Lucene.Net.Index.SegmentReader.Get() -- changed Exception to > SystemException > - Lucene.Net.Search.StringIndex.cs -- added a Close() method > (to fix sort memory leak defect) > - Lucene.Net.Search.FieldCacheImpl.cs -- added a Close() method > (to fix sort memory leak defect) > - Lucene.Net.Search.FieldSortHitQueue.cs -- added a Close() > method (to fix sort memory leak defect) > - Lucene.Net.Search.IndexSearcher.cs -- added a Close() method > (to fix sort memory leak defect) > - Lucene.Net.Search.MatchAllDocsQuery.Clone() -- removed this > unused methods > - Lucene.Net.Search.MultiPhraseQuery.Clone() -- removed this > unused methods > - Lucene.Net.Search.PrefixQuery.Clone() -- removed this unused > methods > - Lucene.Net.Search.RangeQuery.Clone() -- removed this unused > methods > - Lucene.Net.Index.FieldInfos.FieldName()/FieldInfo() -- avoid > the use of exception throwing > - Issues: > Lucene.Net.Search.TestSort.TestInternationalMultiSearcherSort -- NUnit > test FAILS > - Issues: Lucene.Net.Search.TestSort.TestInternationalSort -- > NUnit test FAILS > > I am ready to label Lucene.Net 2.0 as "final" once I get a handle on > the two NUnit tests that are failing. I believe they are failing due > to a defect in the test code of Lucene.Net and not the core code. If > anyone got the cycles to look into this, please let me know. I like > to finalize this 2.0release so we can move on to start supporting .NET > 2.0 and other Lucene port to C#. > > Please start using 2.0 and let me know of any issues. > > And now the release note for Lucene.Net 1.9.1 "final". > > Lucene.Net.1.9.1 build 004 "final" > - Lucene.Net.Index.FieldInfos.FieldName()/FieldInfo() -- avoid > the use of exception throwing > - Lucene.Net.Search.StringIndex.cs -- added a Close() method > (to fix sort memory leak defect) > - Lucene.Net.Search.FieldCacheImpl.cs -- added a Close() method > (to fix sort memory leak defect) > - Lucene.Net.Search.FieldSortHitQueue.cs -- added a Close() > method (to fix sort memory leak defect) > - Lucene.Net.Search.IndexSearcher.cs -- added a Close() method > (to fix sort memory leak defect) > > I don't want to touch this release any more unless if there is a > critical defect such as index corruption, etc. > > Best regards, > > -- George Aroush > >
