Thanks George for the info. Also When do you think an official build for .NET 2.0 is coming out (w/o all the warnings you have when you convert it to .NET 2.0 right now)?
-----Original Message----- From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 5:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Lucene.Net version to get Hi James, A while back, I re-packaged this release as build 4. It is currently staged here: http://people.apache.org/~aroush/Lucene.Net-2.0-004/ and I'm still waiting for three +1 binding votes. So far I only got 1 +1 vote. I don't know why, but it seems to be taking a while. I just submitted another reminder to the PMC, lets hope it gets on their radar this time. Erik: if you can help, please do so. James: If you are currently using build 3, then 4 is 99% the same. And yes, 2.0 is backward compatible with 1.9.x on the index side of things. However, 2.0 has removed depreciated APIs. Regards, -- George Aroush > -----Original Message----- > From: Shaw, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 9:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Lucene.Net version to get > > George and all, > I got the Lucene.Net 2.0 in > > Lucene.Net.2.0-003-26Feb27.src.zip > > that was posted in > > http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/download/ > > but know that it had been pulled for not following Apache > voting process. > > Will the same build will re-appear as a stable release soon? > I read from the mailing list it would be Lucene.Net.2.0-004 > that gets posted rather than 003? I guess my main question > is if our company wants to use stable (released to public) > build of Lucene.Net 2.0, what build should we get, and when > should we expect it to be available? > > Also is Lucene 2.0 backwards compatible with Lucene 1.9.x, > i.e., can 2.0 read index created with 1.9.x? > > Thanks in advance for your answers. >
