Hi, First, thanks for historical post references. However, I'm still not clear as to your reason behind goal number two:
"The APIs are consistent between C# and Java Lucene. This is why I use "GetXYZ()" instead of C# prosperities.". While I understand the maintenance of the APIs from your perspective may be easier by keeping the APIs consistent between the Java and .NET implementations, current .NET API design is more of a hindrance for .NET developers. My hope is to increase adoption within the .NET community by taking advantage of the language constructs such as Generics and indexes, which as I understand are now available for Java. Regards, Michael -----Original Message----- From: Digy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 3:11 PM To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [jira] Created: (LUCENENET-43) Support for .NET Generics Needed Hi All, See the "Lucene.Net Project Involvement" topic in march such as http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-lucene-net-dev/200703.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-lucene-net-dev/200703.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] DIGY -----Original Message----- From: Michael Primeaux (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 7:58 PM To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (LUCENENET-43) Support for .NET Generics Needed Support for .NET Generics Needed -------------------------------- Key: LUCENENET-43 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-43 Project: Lucene.Net Issue Type: Improvement Environment: Windows; Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0; x86 and x64. Reporter: Michael Primeaux Priority: Minor The Analysis, Document, Index, QueryParser, Search, and Store APIs should be modified to support generics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
