Fieldable.ReaderValue should return TextReader not StreamReader
---------------------------------------------------------------
Key: LUCENENET-340
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-340
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Andy Pook
Priority: Minor
Using the more abstract type makes creating custome Fieldables easier as they
can use other TextReader descendants (such as StringReader).
Internally the main use seems to be from DocInverterPerField (eg line 125)
where it is used via a local member of type TextReader.
The original Java uses the abstract Reader type. Is there a reason why the
dotNet conversion uses StreamReader here while using TextReader elsewhere?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
