[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998220#comment-12998220
]
Troy Howard commented on LUCENENET-380:
---------------------------------------
Regarding forking Sharpen, on second thought, they do seem to have activity on
the project. The most recent commit was 2/21/2011, there is an issue tracker, a
somewhat active Sharpen user forum, and have accepted outside patches in the
not so distant past.
Forking might not be appropriate unless it's just for the purposes of working
on a complex patch. Perhaps we should contact the maintainers at db4o and let
them know about our intended use of Sharpen, and see how they feel about
getting regular patches from us. Maybe we can streamline the process a bit.
> Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENENET-380
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Build Automation, Lucene.Net Contrib, Lucene.Net Core,
> Lucene.Net Demo, Lucene.Net Test
> Reporter: George Aroush
> Assignee: Alex Thompson
> Attachments: 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_AfterPostProcessing.zip,
> 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_NoPostProcessing.zip, IndexWriter.java,
> Lucene.Net.3_0_3_Sharpen20110106.zip, Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101104.zip,
> Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101114.zip, NIOFSDirectory.java, QueryParser.java,
> TestBufferedIndexInput.java, TestDateFilter.java
>
>
> This task is to evaluate Sharpen as a port tool for Lucene.Net.
> The files to be evaluated are attached. We need to run those files (which
> are off Java Lucene 2.9.2) against Sharpen and compare the result against
> JLCA result.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
