Michael, That worked!
I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now. Thanks, Troy On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: > > log out and log back in and verify permission changes. > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the C# stuff and > > the other directory stuff." > > > > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C# branch, but > > those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc.. I didn't > > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass. > > > > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like pre_NewStructure" > > > > I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for this exact > > purpose. It's here: > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-change > > > > > > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a list of tasks > > specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where they can > > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority (like > > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower priority like > > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills in creating > > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might want to > > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority. > > > > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list the > > details > > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it seems I don't > > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that. Can whoever > > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is 'thoward'. > > > > Thanks, > > Troy > > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure if there is a > > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory stuff. If > > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like > > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then remove it > > from > > > the trunk. > > > > > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps he can update > > us > > > if he ever got an answer > > > > > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372 (currently assigned > > to > > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them to be out of > > date > > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files from Pasha > > > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could use a review. > > I > > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should have. > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200 > > > > From: ma...@rotselleri.com > > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516) > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the directory > > > structure we have > > > > > going > > > > > > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure. > > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done and in > > > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues for 2.9.4, > > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none of them makes me > > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding. > > > > > > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really working (not to > > > mention I don't know > > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard from Alex in a > > > while, who I think is > > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject. > > > > > > > > Also most important to get closer to the java version. > > > > > > > > > -.NET syntax. > > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use. > > > > > > > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with the idea of you > > > could run Luke in > > > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr and the api > > > provided, no need > > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit different). That said, > > I > > > don't think it's top > > > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net implimentation. > > > > > > > > Agree, it would be nice to have. > > > > > > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he perhaps provide > > an > > > update on > > > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located at bit bucket at > > one > > > point, and then I > > > > > lost track.. > > > > > > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support in mono. I > > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan and it is > > > > continued on > > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at > > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and reporting of > > > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated. > > > > > > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task LUCENET-397, is > > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more paper work > > > > required? > > > > > > > > > > > > /amanuel > > > > >
