Hi Michael, Thank you for a great idea to create a nuget package & prepare other things. I'll do that)
Kind Regards, Alexey Shcherbachev On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:31 PM, michael herndon < mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: > I'm not familiar enough with the licenses or procedures for incorporating > another project outside the ASF to speak on that. Others might have input > on that. > > Another thing that must be considered about is who would be the > responsibility party to in order to keep the project up-to-date against its > own Java project version as well as against Lucene.Net. > > One of the bigger discussions of late is how to best use our limited > resources on a concentrated effort of continually moving Lucene.Net > forward, so there might be some push-back on something like this. It won't > be towards you or the project, but it would stem from the limited time we > all have to work on Lucene.Net > > What I can suggest for the short term is make sure that the library is > compiled and written against the latest 2.9.4 nuget packages. Then > create your own nuget package, if that has not already been done. > > Then write up a concise but enthusiastic description of bobo so that we can > post it on the wiki (or possibly later on a community section of the site > once vetted by committers). We can also use that material post tweets on it > from @LuceneDotNet > > I would also suggest providing list of features and tutorials that make > easy for developers to incorporate it into their own projects that we could > post with the description. > > - Michael > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Alexey Shcherbachev < > ale...@renaissance-it.ru> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Some time ago I ported the amazing Bobo Browse library ( > > http://javasoze.github.com/bobo/ ) from Java to .Net. > > We've been using the port since that time, and it works well so far. > > Right now it is published here http://bobo.codeplex.com/ (binaries are a > > bit outdated, so better check source code directly). > > Initially Bobo was licensed under LGPL license, so we had to keep our > port > > as LGPL too. > > But recently they changed the license to Apache 2.0, so our version is > > under Apache2.0 license too now. > > > > I think such faceting library could be useful for many Lucene.Net > > developers. > > Would it make sense to add it to the contrib folder so more people can > use > > it? > > > > I know the Java version has now the built-in faceting module ( > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079 ) . > > But this version could be used with 2.9.2 and probably with 2.9.4 (not > > tested yet) right now. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Alexey Shcherbachev > > >
