I can only guarantee that these 31 bugs here (in the 3.0.3 version): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/CHANGES.txt are part of the code. I mean, it's possible that other's are, but we'd really need to check the others listed there to be sure that they are also included. However, that's only a difference of 9 bugs, so I think we're very close to a 3.0.3 release, depending on how many issues we want to get done that related to changing the API.
Thanks, Christopher On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>wrote: > > So, Chris if you did this as a direct port of the java version ( > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/), Does > that mean that all of the LUCENE JIRA issues ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+LUCENE+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%223.0.3%22+AND+status+%3D+Closed+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide) > are part of this code already? That would make 3.0.3 well on it's way to > release... ~P > > From: bode...@apache.org > > To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org > > Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:35:25 +0100 > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 3.0.3 > > > > On 2012-01-25, Michael Herndon wrote: > > > > > Do we have a standard of copy or tag of Java's version source that > we're > > > doing a compare against? I only see the 3_1 and above in the tags. > > > > Likely because the svn location has changed in between. I think it must > > be <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/> > > > > Stefan > >
