I just named it 3.5 becuase that's what we have on our roadmap. I believe
you're right though, we should just target 3.6
> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 01:37:15 +0300
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1353075 -
> /incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_3_5/
> From: ita...@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> Why 3.5 and not 3.6?
>
> In my opinion we should skip all versions in between 3.0.3 and 3.6, and
> just port 3.6 after we released 3.0.3. Lucene 4 will probably be released
> by the time we are done, and then we could move on to porting it.
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:35 AM, <pnas...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Author: pnasser
> > Date: Sat Jun 23 06:35:44 2012
> > New Revision: 1353075
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1353075&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Branching for 3.5
> >
> > Added:
> > incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_3_5/ (props changed)
> > - copied from r1353074, incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
> >
> > Propchange: incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_3_5/
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --- svn:mergeinfo (added)
> > +++ svn:mergeinfo Sat Jun 23 06:35:44 2012
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net.3.0.3/trunk:1199075-1294851*
> > +/incubator/lucene.net/trunk:1199072-1294798*
> >
> >
> >
> >
