I think it's usually the project files that are backwards compatible not the solution files. So you need a solution for each vs version but should be able to keep the proj files the same.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>wrote: > Yes > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Christopher Currens > Sent: 8/8/2012 4:22 PM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lucene.NET 3.0.3 Build issues > > Oh, did you do that so we'd have a branch to do bug fixes? I had forgotten > about that. > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com > >wrote: > > > I just created 3.0.3 last weekend - it should be incredibly up to date. > > Anything in trunk should be there > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone > > ________________________________ > > From: Christopher Currens > > Sent: 8/8/2012 1:35 PM > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Lucene.NET 3.0.3 Build issues > > > > Thanks for the feedback. Let us know if you run into any more > > issues/concerns. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Christopher > > > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Granroth, Neal V. < > > neal.granr...@thermofisher.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes I pulled from the branch not the trunk. I apparently made the > > > incorrect assumption that it would be slightly more stable than the > > current > > > work-in-progress. > > > > > > Thanks for the quick attention and clarifications. Especially for > those > > > that rely upon the binary packages. > > > > > > - Neal > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 3:21 PM > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Lucene.NET 3.0.3 Build issues > > > > > > FYI - SVN has been updated with corrected VS2010 solutions and added > > VS2012 > > > directory/solution files. > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Christopher Currens < > > > currens.ch...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > See inline comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Christopher > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Granroth, Neal V. < > > > > neal.granr...@thermofisher.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> I just pulled down the 3.0.3 branch from SVN and have encountered an > > > >> initial problem with the VisualStudio solution file > > Lucene.Net.Core.sln > > > in > > > >> the VS2010 folder. > > > >> > > > >> Did you pull down the 3.0.3 branch or trunk? Trunk is 3.0.3, I'm > not > > > > even sure the 3.0.3 branch exists anymore, and if it does, it is > very, > > > very > > > > out of date. > > > > > > > > > > > >> This solution will not load in VS2010, Visual Studio complains that > it > > > >> was created with a newer version. > > > >> Opening the solution file in notepad reveals that it was created > with > > > >> VS2012 (a not yet released product) > > > >> > > > >> They are supposed to be VS2010, if the pathing didn't give it away. > I > > > > believe it was my fault, as I usually will change them back to VS2010 > > > > manually, but forgot to do that while I was adding .NET 3.5 support > > back > > > > in. In order to automate the change, I needed to use the RC and > forgot > > > to > > > > change the solution files back. As an aside, VS2012 solution files > are > > > (or > > > > at least supposed to be) backwards compatible with VS2010. On my > > laptop, > > > > which only has VS2010 SP1, they open and compile just fine. > > > > > > > > > > > >> It would be very helpful if those maintaining the source > distribution > > > >> limit themselves to released development tools only. > > > >> > > > >> Since that's our normal policy, this isn't really an issue. > > > > > > > > > > > >> It also make me wonder of the viability of any binary distributions; > > > they > > > >> certainly should not have been created with VS2012RC > > > >> > > > > > > > > Prescott used VS2010 to make the binary, so I don't think you need to > > > > worry about this. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> - Neal G. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
