Actively working on it as we speak, should be ready by Tuesday. Up to you :)
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>wrote: > > > > Itamar - can you provide a status update on what work you've done on the > Geometry stuff? If it's something that you're close on, could we commit it > to the trunk and 3.0.3 branch so that the community could try their hand at > finishing it? If not, I think we should move without it. I don't want to > hold off 3.0.3 that much longer > > > Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages > > From: zgram...@gmail.com > > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:18:17 -0400 > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > > > Glad to hear it. > > > > FWIW, I've deployed the Spatial contrib on client projects against > 2.9.4.1, which would break without the Geometry namespace. I'm doubt I'm > the only one. > > > > I would encourage not releasing the 3.0.3 Contribs.Spatial until that is > included. I think most people using the stable NuGet feed would expect > 3.0.3 to be complete with respect to Java Lucene. It may take people quite > a bit of work to get their code working again in 3.0.3 with just the > .NETification changes alone. If people find that, after all that work, they > now have to wait for a maintenance release, there could be some real grumpy > coders out there taking to social media with pitch forks in hand. > > > > It sounded like he was done with 4.0 and just back porting to 3.5. I > would be happy to lend Itamar a hand, if he feels it could help. > > > > > > On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Christopher Currens < > currens.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Itamar said a few weeks ago he was planning on > > > getting polygon support into the spatial module (I am assuming that > > > this is the Geometry namespace). I'm unsure if it will make it into > > > the official 3.0.3 release or it if it will be pushed back into a > > > maintenance release shortly after. > > > > >
