See this Sample.
http://www.udanax.org/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/Udanax.Net/for.MSSQL/
then inverted index of lucene can be created using this sample.
----
B. regards,
edward yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+82-31-784-4038, +82-10-7149-7856
http://www.udanax.org/
From: Ren?de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: How to store index data efficiently.
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:40:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mail.apache.org ([140.211.11.2]) by bay0-pamc1-f13.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:40:50 -0800
Received: (qmail 98912 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2007 17:40:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 98897 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2007 17:40:57 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:40:57 -0800
Received: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 62.132.94.60 as permitted sender)
Received: from [62.132.94.60] (HELO mail.howardshome.com) (62.132.94.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:40:46 -0800
>If your requiremens for search aren't to complex AND your database isn't too large, then you should considers SQL Server's Full Text service. Works well, and with SQL Server 2005 it is quite usable.
>
>We have a database of 20M records with full text documents, and that is more then SQL can cope with for all sorts of reasons. We used Lucene to build an indexer that keeps in sync with a SQL table, and allows for VERY fast searches. All it gives back are unique ID's wich we can use to lookup the records again in the SQL database.
>
>Ren?lt;br>>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: vietpd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: dinsdag 20 februari 2007 15:18
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: How to store index data efficiently.
>
>Hello everybody,
>
>There is one problem that make me wonder so much, and I post this to collect
>your advices.
>
>
>
>I use dotlucene to index raw data, and use SQL server to store indexed
>data(text data that was parsed from many other sources). Howerver, I'm not
>experienced with dotlucene and I don't know if it's better or not storing
>indexed data in SQL instead of storing it with dotlucene.
>
>
>
>Can anyone give me advices please?
>
>
>
>Thanks and regards
>
>
>
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger Download today it's FREE!
