Yes, I had to remove all 2.0 ZIP "releases" until when I straighten things out about releases. Your only option right now is to get the source off SVN.
I will say more about it in response to Erik's email: "good incubator citizen". Regards, -- George Aroush -----Original Message----- From: Michael Mitiaguin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Search using .Net code in Java based Index if you read readme.txt at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/site/download/ === As of February 21, 2007, all 2.0 releases of Lucene.Net, Highlighter.Net, Snowball.Net, SpellChecker.Net, and WordNet.Net have been removed pending ASF release process review and proper packaging and inclusion of legal files. -- George Aroush === I don't know what differences are between my check out and your download . So you may either try to use external adapter if your code identical ( similar )to mine ( I gave an excerpt in previous email ) or wait when download with Net 2 built-in compression will be available. On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using Lucene.Net 2.0,.. > > > On 2/23/07, Michael Mitiaguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Honestly , now I am not sure now what I checked out . I just > > selected head trunk in tortoiseSVN screen . But just browsing the > > code it seems to be strange to see : ( I thought there is no > > backward computability ) > > > > SupportClass.cs > > > > /// <summary> > > /// Use for .NET 1.1 Framework only. > > /// </summary> > > public class CompressionSupport > > { > > public interface ICompressionAdapter > > { > > byte[] Compress(byte[] input); > > byte[] Uncompress(byte[] input); > > } > > > > private static ICompressionAdapter compressionAdapter; > > > > public static byte[] Uncompress(byte[] input) > > { > > CheckCompressionSupport(); > > return compressionAdapter.Uncompress(input); > > } > > > > public static byte[] Compress(byte[] input) > > { > > CheckCompressionSupport(); > > return compressionAdapter.Compress(input); > > } > > > > private static void CheckCompressionSupport() > > { > > if (compressionAdapter == null) > > { > > System.String compressionLibClassName = > > SupportClass.AppSettings.Get("Lucene.Net.CompressionLib.class", null); > > if (compressionLibClassName == null) > > throw new System.SystemException("Compression > > support not configured"); > > > > Type compressionLibClass = > > Type.GetType(compressionLibClassName, true); > > System.Object compressionAdapterObj = > > Activator.CreateInstance(compressionLibClass); > > compressionAdapter = compressionAdapterObj as > > ICompressionAdapter; > > if (compressionAdapter == null) > > throw new System.SystemException("Compression > > adapter does not support the ICompressionAdapter interface"); > > } > > } > > } > > } > > > > Also I don't what version you are using . If you are in 1.9 try the > > following , why there is no recognition for Net 2 , I don't know : > > > > SharpZipLibAdapter.cs > > /// To enable compression support in Lucene.Net 1.9 using .NET 1.1. > > Framework, /// you will need to define 'SHARP_ZIP_LIB' and referance > > the SharpLibZip /// library. The SharpLibZip library can be downloaded from: > > /// http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SharpZipLib/ > > /// > > /// You can use any other cmpression library you have by plugging it > > into this /// code or by providing your own adapter as in this one. > > > > > > #if SHARP_ZIP_LIB > > ... > > > > > > > > > > On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ok..thanks... > > > > > > but what should i do for now .. any other way.. ? > > > > > > > > > On 2/23/07, Michael Mitiaguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Coincidentally I've just run Nunit tests against subversion > > > > version and there were failed tests . One of them : > > > > Lucene.Net.Document.TestBinaryDocument.TestBinaryFieldInIndex : > > > > System.SystemException : Compression support not configured > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we expect some tests to fail ? > > > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I have tried, Its gives me "Compression not configured" > > > > > exception...while searching using .Net code.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/23/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, the index generated by Java or C# Lucene are cross > > > > > > compatible. If fact, if you share the lock file, you can > > > > > > have a Java and a C# Lucene read/write to the same index > > > > > > concurrently. Just make sure you are using the same release version if you do this. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- George Aroush > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Dean Harding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:24 PM > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Subject: RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java > > > > > > > code and after that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so what should i do ? > > > > > > > > > > > > The file format is the same, I believe, so it should "just > > > > > > work" without anything special. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dean. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
