Surely that is dependent on the Lucene Analyzer (Standard, Simple, Snowball etc) you use. I'm not sure there is any choice with SQL Server.
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 02:29 -0700, Michael Paine wrote: > I have found many words not tokenized (and indexed) by Lucene.NET which are > tokenized/indexed by SQL Server 2005 full-text. Is there a way to optimize > lucene's tokenizer so it handles more words? >
