To continue a thread from earlier: Simone Busoli recommends that in
order to get involved with Lucene.Net, we should compare the source code
with the java 2.1 version and find any differences and patch them. Does
this mean that there is a running list somewhere of classes that have
already been compared? Which ones need work?
Also, in response to George's request for developers: it would be a lot,
lot easier to get people to work on Lucene.Net if it wasn't supposed to
be such a literal translation of the java code. Straight translation is
boring. I don't see why a .net style can't be introduced immediately. I
like and use Lucene.net and would like to see it stay healthy.
