Seems immature to me, might be usable in the future. On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > What about xbuild? http://www.mono-project.com/Microsoft.Build > > DIGY > > -----Original Message----- > From: László Monda [mailto:l...@monda.hu] > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:37 PM > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Building Lucene.Net from SVN > > There is no MSBuild on *nix environments. There is NAnt on Ubuntu > Linux, but not many projects are using it and it may not be present on > other *niix platforms. There is also mdtool which is part of > MonoDevelop that could be used for building Lucene.Net on Linux. > > One thing is sure: I won't use the above tools because > 1) I'm not sure that they are present on a wide range of platforms > 2) my Makefile already does respects the .csproj file and > 3) building works out of the box by typing "make". > > I submit the Makefile to JIRA if none of the lead developers here disagree. > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Andy Pook <andy.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The problem is that not all the cs files should be included. ie >> DocumentWriter.cs is _not_ included in the VisualStudio project. >> Certainly a PITA for anyone not using VS or SharpDevelop (which >> understands csproj files) >> >> However, csproj files are just xml so a fairly simple XPath on the >> csproj file will render a list of the files that are included. You >> should be able to feed that list as a file into gmcs. >> >> The xpath is "/Project/ItemGroup/Compile/@Include" (you will need to >> be careful with specifying the correct namespace to >> (xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003";). >> >> I have attached the list as an attachment. >> >> warning: I do not have a linux + mono machine to test this with right >> now so YMMV >> >> Hope this helps you. >> >> Regards, >> Andy >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:09 PM, L�szl� Monda <l...@monda.hu> wrote: >> >>> For those of you who have any doubts about Mono I must say that it >>> works perfectly well. It's getting more and more popular, it's rock >>> stable and it even outperforms MS .NET in some areas. There are a >>> number of big and popular projects that are using it right now. I >>> don't wanna make a debate about it, just want to make things clear. >>> >>> Command line compilation might seem unusual and there are other ways >>> even on Linux, but it always worked well for me. The current SVN >>> trunk might be 2.3.1 or anything else, but it's clearly broken right >>> now. It's not that I've included some files that I shouldn't have >>> been, but there are some required files (like DocumentWriter.cs) that >>> are clearly broken. >>> >>> I'd really appreciate if developers could tag the appropriate versions >>> so that one could check out the preferred version and build it without >>> errors. >>> >>> I hope that someone can help me to build Lucene.Net because otherwise >>> I'll have to port my little application to Java to use Java Lucene >>> which I wouldn't prefer since I really love the .NET platform. >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Laimonas Simutis <lai...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Ciaran Roarty <ciaran.roa...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> So that could be built on Windows and used with Mono? >>> > >>> > Would not recommend doing that. I have seen it work, but more than >>> > often, at least for my projects, I was getting mysterious crashes that >>> > would go away after recompiling with mono. >>> > >>> > I personally haven't tried compiling lucene.net with mono, and cannot >>> > try it right now, but could give it a shot later on in the evening... >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >> >>> >> On 17 Feb 2009, at 17:26, Laimonas Simutis <lai...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:02 AM, DIGY <d...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Current version of Lucene.Net in svn-trunk (2.3.1) is stable and can >>> be >>> >>>> compiled without any error. >>> >>>> Use project/solution file to compile the project. I personally use >>> Visual >>> >>>> C# 2005 Express Edition. You will get thousands of warnings about >>> unused >>> >>>> variables or XML documentation but it is OK. >>> >>> >>> >>> Yeah, but it looks like he is using mono c# compiler, which basically >>> >>> tries to build all .cs files in the directory (I think). Maybe there >>> >>> are some left over, undeleted files hanging around in directories that >>> >>> are not part of VS IDE project file. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> DIGY >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>>> From: L�szl� Monda [mailto:l...@monda.hu] >>> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 5:53 PM >>> >>>> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org >>> >>>> Subject: Building Lucene.Net from SVN >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I've checked out the latest revision lately, then tried to build >>> >>>> Lucene by using the following command: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> $ gmcs -t:library -r:System.Configuration `find Lucene.Net -name >>> >>>> '*.cs' ! -name RemoteSearchable.cs -type f` -out:Lucene.Net.dll >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Here is what I got: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Analysis/Standard/TokenMgrError.cs(49,18): error CS8025: >>> >>>> Parsing error >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(126,57): error CS8025: Parsing >>> error >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/SegmentReade-2r.cs(32,22): error CS0101: The >>> >>>> namespace `Lucene.Net.Index' already contains a definition for >>> >>>> `SegmentReader' >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/SegmentReader.cs(34,22): (Location of the symbol >>> >>>> related to previous error) >>> >>>> Compilation failed: 3 error(s), 0 warnings >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I removed SegmentReade-2r.cs, fixed the messed up comments in >>> >>>> TokenMgrError.cs and DocumentWriter.cs and tried again. Here's the >>> >>>> result: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(109,41): warning CS1717: Assignment >>> >>>> made to same variable; did you mean to assign something else? >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(116,41): warning CS1717: Assignment >>> >>>> made to same variable; did you mean to assign something else? >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(123,41): warning CS1717: Assignment >>> >>>> made to same variable; did you mean to assign something else? >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(130,41): warning CS1717: Assignment >>> >>>> made to same variable; did you mean to assign something else? >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(137,41): warning CS1717: Assignment >>> >>>> made to same variable; did you mean to assign something else? >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(83,55): warning CS0219: The variable >>> >>>> `cal' is assigned but its value is never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Document/DateTools.cs(290,55): warning CS0219: The variable >>> >>>> `cal' is assigned but its value is never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/LockStressTest.cs(65,49): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/LockStressTest.cs(75,67): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/LockStressTest.cs(79,60): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/LockStressTest.cs(83,49): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/LockStressTest.cs(114,66): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/FSDirectory.cs(337,91): warning CS0168: The variable >>> >>>> `e' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Store/FSDirectory.cs(534,54): warning CS0219: The variable >>> >>>> `generatedAux' is assigned but its value is never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Search/FilterManager.cs(270,92): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Search/FieldCacheImpl.cs(482,87): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `nfe3' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Search/FieldCacheImpl.cs(475,79): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `nfe1' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Search/ParallelMultiSearcher.cs(101,84): warning CS0168: >>> >>>> The variable `ie' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Search/ParallelMultiSearcher.cs(153,84): warning CS0168: >>> >>>> The variable `ie' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Search/Function/DocValues.cs(143,72): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/SegmentInfos.cs(401,54): warning CS0168: The variable >>> >>>> `e' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/SegmentInfos.cs(660,102): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `err2' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/SegmentInfos.cs(673,116): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/MultiReader.cs(182,86): warning CS0168: The variable >>> >>>> `ignore' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(393,82): error CS1061: Type >>> >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' does not contain a definition for >>> >>>> `OpenDocument' and no extension method `OpenDocument' of type >>> >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' could be found (are you missing >> a >>> >>>> using directive or an assembly reference?) >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(395,74): error CS1061: Type >>> >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' does not contain a definition for >>> >>>> `OpenField' and no extension method `OpenField' of type >>> >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' could be found (are you missing >> a >>> >>>> using directive or an assembly reference?) >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(399,74): error CS1061: Type >>> >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' does not contain a definition for >>> >>>> `CloseField' and no extension method `CloseField' of type >>> >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' could be found (are you missing >> a >>> >>>> using directive or an assembly reference?) >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(402,90): error CS1061: Type >>> >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' does not contain a definition for >>> >>>> `IsFieldOpen' and no extension method `IsFieldOpen' of type >>> >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' could be found (are you missing >> a >>> >>>> using directive or an assembly reference?) >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(404,66): error CS1061: Type >>> >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' does not contain a definition for >>> >>>> `AddTerm' and no extension method `AddTerm' of type >>> >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' could be found (are you missing >> a >>> >>>> using directive or an assembly reference?) >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/DocumentWriter.cs(408,58): error CS1061: Type >>> >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' does not contain a definition for >>> >>>> `CloseDocument' and no extension method `CloseDocument' of type >>> >>>> `Lucene.Net.Index.TermVectorsWriter' could be found (are you missing >> a >>> >>>> using directive or an assembly reference?) >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/IndexFileDeleter.cs(177,96): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/IndexFileDeleter.cs(221,62): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `e' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/MultiSegmentReader.cs(61,78): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `ignore' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Lucene.Net/Index/MultiSegmentReader.cs(161,94): warning CS0168: The >>> >>>> variable `ignore' is declared but never used >>> >>>> Compilation failed: 6 error(s), 28 warnings >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I don't wanna hack Lucene just to build it and I cannot use the latest >>> >>>> build because it is 14 months old and works horribly slowly. I'm >>> >>>> extremely disappointed about the current state of Lucene.Net. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Anybody has any suggestion how to build Lucene.Net from the SVN? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Ron Grabowski < >>> rongrabow...@yahoo.com> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> What version of Lucene.net are you using? I found that when I built >>> the >>> >>>>> latest version from source the index building was blazingly fast >>> compared to >>> >>>>> the latest binaries on the website. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> >>>>> From: L�szl� Monda <l...@monda.hu> >>> >>>>> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org >>> >>>>> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 4:18:35 PM >>> >>>>> Subject: IndexWriter.AddDocument is slow >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Hi List, >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> It takes pretty long time to index documents using Lucene.Net. >> It >>> >>>>> takes about 3 seconds to add thounsand documents to the index. >> I've >>> >>>>> used Java Lucene in the past and according to my memories indexing >>> >>>>> should be about 20 times faster. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Here's the relevant code: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> IndexWriter index_writer = new IndexWriter("index", new >>> >>>>> StandardAnalyzer(), true); >>> >>>>> // index_writer.SetMergeFactor(10000); >>> >>>>> // index_writer.SetMaxMergeDocs(10000); >>> >>>>> // index_writer.SetMaxBufferedDocs(10000); >>> >>>>> ExecuteSqlQuery("SELECT artist, title FROM songname"); >>> >>>>> int count = 0; >>> >>>>> while (reader.Read()) { >>> >>>>> if (count > 0 && count%1000 == 0) { >>> >>>>> Console.WriteLine(count); >>> >>>>> } >>> >>>>> Document document = new Document(); >>> >>>>> document.Add(new Field("artist", >>> >>>>> reader.GetString("artist"), Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED)); >>> >>>>> document.Add(new Field("title", >>> >>>>> reader.GetString("title"), Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED)); >>> >>>>> index_writer.AddDocument(document); >>> >>>>> count++; >>> >>>>> } >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> When decommenting the commented lines indexing gets about 2x faster, >>> >>>>> but it's not really significant. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I'd really appreciate your insights about this speed issue. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> -- >>> >>>>> Laci <http://monda.hu> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> Laci <http://monda.hu> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Laci <http://monda.hu> >>> >> > > > > -- > Laci <http://monda.hu> > >
-- Laci <http://monda.hu>
