I am running all tests on the same box - a Windows workstation. Granted the comparison might not quite be apples vs apples in a true scientific sense, at least it would be slightly more scientific than some of the anecdotal information shared by some here.
so perhaps green apples vs red apples :-) 2009/5/13 Digy <[email protected]>: > I think, at first, it is just a simple comparison of results of the same > code with the same index on the same hardware. > > After then, some optimizations specific to to .Net or Java (or more complex > test cases) can be thought. > > DIGY. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Todd Carrico [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:57 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Lucene Java Vs .Net > > My issue with this type of comparison is the difference in hardware. Small > differences can make a big impact. > > What are you doing to make sure this is apples to apples as far as hardware > goes? > > tc > > -----Original Message----- > From: Digy [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 2:48 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Lucene Java Vs .Net > > Hi Shashi > > [email protected] could be a good place to discuss your tests and > results. > I eagerly wait your results. > > DIGY > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shashi Kant [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 3:21 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Lucene Java Vs .Net > > Hi, I am bumping up this thread to see if there are any further inputs > on this. I was planning on running a benchmarking test for .NET vs > Java for both Indexing & Querying (single field, multi field, span > etc.), and would be happy to share my results. I would be using the > PubMed corpus of biomedical literature and running indexing on a few > million articles. > > I would be interested to see if others are running on other corpora, > sharing ideas would be very helpful IMHO. > > Regards, > Shashi > > > > > > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Matt Honeycutt <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I haven't compared Lucene to Lucene.NET, but I have seen huge performance >> improvements in Weka on .NET vs. Java. Taking the Java jar files and > using >> IKVM.NET to produce a .NET assembly resulted in a huge performance >> improvement. I would fully expect Lucene.NET to hold a similar > performance >> advantage over its Java equivalent. >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Granroth, Neal V. < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'd also be interested in hearing about performance differences between > the >>> two. Out of idle curiosity I run a few very basic trials. I expected > there >>> to be no noticeable difference, but was surprised to find the .NET >>> application ran 3x faster than the Java equivalent. >>> >>> -- Neal >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of Wayne Douglas >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 3:46 AM >>> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: Lucene Java Vs .Net >>> >>> Does anyone have any benchmark data on the performance of these two - >>> purely >>> out of interest :) >>> >>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Andreas Mummenhoff <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > yes, >>> > Lucene.Net is a class-per-class, API-per-API and algorithmatic port of >>> the >>> > Java Version. The release numbers are the same, so Java Lucene 2.3.1 ~= >>> > Lucene.Net 2.3.1 >>> > And the consequence of this is index compatibility, so you can search > and >>> > fill a Lucene.Net index with Java Lucene and the other way round. >>> > >>> > Andreas >>> > >>> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> > Von: MBVV.Satish [mailto:[email protected]] >>> > Gesendet: Montag, 4. Mai 2009 22:47 >>> > An: [email protected] >>> > Betreff: Lucene Java Vs .Net >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > We are currently using Java based Lucene in one of our products. We > have >>> a >>> > product in Microsoft .Net where we intend to use Lucene.Net. >>> > My question is.... >>> > 1.) Is Lucene.Net has all the features of Java version? or is there any >>> > specific limitation to .Net version? >>> > 2.) Is Lucene.Net is class-per-class, API-per-API and algorithmatic > port >>> > of Java Version? if so are the releases comparable by release numbers >>> i.e., >>> > .Net 2.3 with Java 2.3? >>> > 3.) Is it possible to use the same Lucene indexes in Java Version as > well >>> > as .Net Version? >>> > >>> > Please answer my above questions so that it will be helpful in > deciding >>> on >>> > the use of Lucene .Net. >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > Satish >>> > >>> > >>> > Now surf faster and smarter ! Check out the new Firefox 3 - Yahoo! >>> > Edition http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/firefox/?fr=om_email_firefox >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> >>> w:// >>> >> > >
