+1

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Grahem Cuthbertson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene
>> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:49:20 -0400
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>>
>>
>> This vote calls to graduate the Lucene.Net project
>> (http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/) as a sub-project under Apache
>> Lucene.
>>
>>
>>
>> Everyone in the Lucene.Net community is welcome to vote. The goal is to see
>> no "-1" and all the committers must cast a "+1" before we can move on for a
>> final vote by the Apache IPMC.
>>
>>
>>
>> The rationale for graduation is:
>>
>> * Lucene.Net has been under incubation since April 2006 (3 1/2 years now).
>>
>> * During incubation, Lucene.Net has:
>>
>> - Made, 1 official release
>> (Incubating-Apache-Lucene.Net-2.0-004-11Mar07).
>>
>> - Released, as SVN tag, 18 ports of Java Lucene (from 1.9 to 2.4.0).
>>
>> - Released, as SVN tag, port of WordNet.Net 2.0, SpellChecker.Net 2.0,
>> Snowball.Net 2.0, and Highlighter.Net 2.0.
>>
>> - Released, MSDN style documentation for the above release.
>>
>> - Accepted, two new committers: Isik YIGIT (DIGY) digydigy @ gmail.com
>> and Doug Sale dsale @ myspace-inc.com were added in November 2008 (George
>> Aroush george @ aroush.net is the original committer).
>>
>> - The community has grown, with a healthy followers.
>>
>> - Is being used by well established companies in production (I'm not
>> sure what's the legality to mention their names here, or even if I have the
>> complete list).
>>
>> - Is being used by Beagle project.
>>
>>
>>
>> If this graduation is approved, Lucene.Net will be officially called "Apache
>> Lucene.Net"
>>
>>
>>
>> Please cast your votes:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Graduate Lucene.Net as a sub-project under Apache Lucene.
>>
>> [ ] 0 I don't care.
>>
>> [ ] -1 Lucene.Net is not ready to graduate as a sub-project under Apache
>> Lucene, because ...
>>
>>
>>
>> This vote will close on September 21st, 2009.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> -- George
>>
>

Reply via email to