If the API was kept as-is then the Lucene in Action examples would be correct.
There are obvious correlations with Mono in this regard. C On 1 Nov 2010, at 16:34, Robert Jordan <robe...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 01.11.2010 15:50, Ciaran Roarty wrote: >> Then I think it will die. >> >> Ask Digy, George, Doug, and Michael how they feel about working hard to port >> the current source and get continually hit with questions on the mailing >> list that a quick search ( no pun intended ) could have resolved. > > And a new incompatible Lucene.NET would not raise any questions? > > You won't be even able to point them to something like > "Lucene in Action" because there will be no book about > "Lucene.NET done right" for at least a decade. > >> Mono doesn't port from .NET but they do match the API. > > I fail to see any similarity. > > Robert >
