Hi, We recently tried it in our app, everything works fine but we measured a ~5% performance hit and slightly more RAM usage.
But for the reasons stated in the threads linked by Digy, I don't believe it would be a viable solution for the future of the Lucene.Net project. --- Jean-Francois Beaulac -----Message d'origine----- De : Hans Merkl [mailto:h...@hmerkl.com] Envoyé : November 2, 2010 10:59 AM À : lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org Objet : Re: Lucene.NET Community Status Has anybody tried using Lucene with IKVM.NET? I haven't tried it myself (yet) but I keep hearing it works pretty well. That way, there would ne no need for porting the actual code, instead you just convert the Java executables to .NET. If it works, it seems a much faster approach than porting the source code. On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 09:55, Wyatt Barnett <wyatt.barn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not sure if this is the right way to volunteer, but I've got limited > experience with Lucene but it has been the best thing since sliced > bread to me and I'd love to contribute to the project in any way I > can. > > I'll also add that I've been running a home-compiled version of the > 2.9.2 branch in production for the last few months with no problems, > so I think it wouldn't take much to push that as a new binary release. > > While I've got the floor, I'm also definitely down with the suggestion > for a .NET ethos friendly wrapper -- could help the cause quite a bit > by making this much more approachable for the rest of the .NET world. >
