This works perfectly, thanks Troy! I'm in your debt. --- On Thu, 12/16/10, Troy Howard <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Troy Howard <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Concatenated TokenStreams > To: [email protected] > Date: Thursday, December 16, 2010, 9:36 PM > Here's some example code that seems > to work... > > In a nutshell, I created a new kind of field and a new kind > of > TokenStream (MultiField and MultiTokenStream)... Both of > which just > handle aggregation logic. > > https://gist.github.com/744444 > > This is a naive example, so you might need to do a bit more > to toughen > it up for production use. It takes advantage of > CaptureState and > RestoreState in the TokenStream API, so this might not be > the best > performing code in the world, but it should point you in > the right > direction. > > > Thanks, > Troy > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Ben West <[email protected]> > wrote: > > wow yeah, that would be awesome. > > > > I'm using 2.9.2 > > > > Thanks, > > -ben > > > > --- On Thu, 12/16/10, Troy Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> From: Troy Howard <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: Concatenated TokenStreams > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Thursday, December 16, 2010, 3:10 PM > >> Ben, > >> > >> This seems totally possible with a wrapper. I'll > see if I > >> can't mock > >> up a prototype. > >> > >> I assume you're using 2.9.2? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Troy > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Ben West <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Hey All, > >> > > >> > I want to make something roughly equivalent > to Solr's > >> copy fields. However, I can't just concatenate the > values > >> into one string then put that into a field, > because each > >> field needs its appropriate analyzer. > >> > > >> > I know you can instantiate a field with a > token stream > >> as an input, but I'm not sure how to combine > multiple token > >> streams into one. I tried to make a wrapper class > to do > >> this, but I can't figure out how since with the > attribute > >> API I can't switch the attributes they already had > onto a > >> new stream. > >> > > >> > I checked Solr's source, and as far as I > could tell it > >> doesn't seem like they allow each input field to > be > >> tokenized in its own way (though I could > definitely be > >> misreading it). > >> > > >> > Does anyone know if this is possible? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > -Ben > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
