There are already a few other forks going on... On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Dec 23, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Wyatt Barnett wrote: > > > In case anyone wants to read the discussion, it can be found at > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/113252. > > > > As for the subject matter, frankly I think help has been rejected or > > at least not accepted -- see issues such as > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379 for one example. > > Just to be clear on my role here: I am not interested in doing work on > Lucene.NET and will not be doing commits to the project. I just have the > role, as PMC chair, of making sure the projects we are responsible for are > active and healthy. The committers on the project are responsible for > moving the project forward and doing the real work. To the point of my > original email, the fact that the PMC and the committers are not (mostly) > the same people is problematic for this project and reason #1 of why it > belongs either as it's own standalone project at the ASF or somewhere else. > > I would suggest, at this point, that anyone who is interested in this > project remaining alive to go to > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html and then start on an > Incubator Proposal and let others here know about it. > > > > > > Insofar as an official 2.9.2 release -- what is involved? From what I > > can tell, 2.9.2 has been a de-facto release for the better part of a > > year at least. Do we just need to build some binaries and say it is > > so? > > > > See http://apache.org/dev/#releases. Again, however, you need committers > who are willing to do the work. As stated above, you are probably better > off spending your time putting together an Incubator proposal. > > -Grant > > > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> In my opinion, no, it has not. Not one of the committers responded to > my repeated appeals for the Board Report and, AFAICT, the website, etc. have > not been updated. There is currently a PMC level discussion taking place at > [email protected] (the subject is "Next Steps on Lucene.NET") on > what the next steps should be. > >> > >> On Dec 22, 2010, at 4:54 AM, Simone Chiaretta wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> just wanted to know if the Lucene.net team managed to do the things the > >>> "board" was asking in order to keep it alive. > >>> I cannot see anything online (new website, latest "official" release, > no new > >>> commits). > >>> > >>> Simone > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Simone Chiaretta > >>> Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider > >>> Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz > >>> RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber > >>> twitter: @simonech > >>> > >>> Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic > >>> "Life is short, play hard" > >> > >> > > > -- Simone Chiaretta Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber twitter: @simonech Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic "Life is short, play hard"
