Most probably, I don't understand the problem. Lucene is intented to be a *fast* search engine on *huge* data and people are trying to increase the performance using every tricks that exist. If I don't have enough NW bandwidht comparable to local disk access why should I use AzureDirectory (or any Webdav-server or iSCSI). This structure also includes sharing (possible)sensitive data with MS. Just to avoid backups?
PS: I would surely give it a try if I could set up a "Azure Blob Storage - server" on my fast local network. DIGY -----Original Message----- From: Anders Lybecker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Using Lucene.Net with Windows Azure Hi Corey, I forgot the link - classic LOL Here: http://www.lybecker.com/blog/2011/01/16/using-lucene-net-with-microsoft-azur e/ :-) Anders On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Corey Brand <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can you provide a link? > - Corey > > > > > Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:30:31 +0100 > > Subject: Using Lucene.Net with Windows Azure > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > > > Hi, > > > > I have just written an article about using Lucene.Net with Microsoft > Azure > > on my blog. > > > > I have analyzed the different options, focusing on storage, as it major > > paradigm shift. > > > > Let me know what you think? > > > > :-) > > Anders Lybecker > >
