I agree, a line by line is of little use to me. Sent from my Windows Phone
-----Original Message----- From: Kieran Logan Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 12:15 PM To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? > Hi Scott > > Can only speak for my own interests. The line-by-line port is not of > interest or to put it another way, I would consider a .Net 4 version which > uses the framework optimally of far greater interest than a line-by-line > port. > > Kieran > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com] > Sent: 29 June 2011 19:58 > To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? > > > > After the large community response about moving the code base from .Net 2.0 > to Net 4.0 I am trying to figure out what is the need for a line-by-line > port. Starting with Digy's excellent work on the conversion to generics a > priority of the 2.9.4g release is the 2 packages would not be > interchangeable. So faster turnaround from a java release won't matter to > non line-by-line users they will have to wait until the updates are made to > the non line-by-line code base. > > > > My question is there really a user base for the line-by-line port? Anyone > have a comment? > > > > Scott > > > > > > > >
