Hello,
ok I see this wasn't a good sample. Here is another:
I'd like to index german text. So the field "content" can e.g. contain
the words "Auto" and "Autotür".
If I search for "Aut*" the order is still:
1.) Autotür
2.) Auto
The field "content" can contain a complete text. What analyzer should I use?
Thank You
Björn
Am 17.08.2011 16:45, schrieb Robert Jordan:
Hi,
You're either using the wrong analyzer (e.g. StandardAnalyzer
is not suitable for this kind of values) or you're not using
the same analyzer during indexing and search.
Your data looks like it should be stored unanalyzed
(Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED).
Robert
On 17.08.2011 16:17, Björn Kremer wrote:
Hello Anders,
thank you for the answer.
Here is a little sample that shows my problem:
I have 4 documents with the field "test"(and some more fields):
Doc-Number -> Value in field "test"
1 -> TEST001
2 -> TEST001A
3 -> TEST001B
4 -> TEST001C
Now I send a wildcard query like this:
test:TEST00*
This returns a list with this order:
TEST001B
TEST001C
TEST001A
TEST001
But I think "TEST001" should be the first match because "TEST001" has
the best fit to "TEST00".
Thank you
Björn
Björn Kremer
Brügmann Software GmbH
Bokeler Straße 18
26871 Papenburg
Phone: +49(0)4962-9119-43
Fax: +49(0)4962-9119-33
mailto: b...@patorg.de
Internet: www.patorg.de
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Papenburg
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 202707
Ust.-Id.-Nr.: DE 262 943 559
Geschäftsführer: Dipl.-Ing. Jochen Brügmann, Dipl.-Kfr. Julia Brügmann,
Dipl.-Inf. Sören Brügmann
Diese E-Mail und ihre eventuellen Anlagen können vertrauliche
Informationen enthalten. Wenn Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich empfangen
haben, dann bitten wir die E-Mail zu vernichten und uns zu informieren.
Jedes Verwenden, Kopieren, Verbreiten oder sonstiges Benutzen des
Inhalts der irrtümlich empfangenen E-Mail ist untersagt.
Am 17.08.2011 15:03, schrieb Anders Lybecker:
Hej Björn,
The default search order (Relevance) will return the best match as the
first
result.
:-)
Anders Lybecker
2011/8/17 Björn Kremer<b...@patorg.de>
Hi,
what is the default sort order for lucene search results? I'm using
lucene
2.9 and send a query that looks like this:
topdocs= IndexSearcherInstance.Search(**query,null,limit,
Lucene.Net.Search.Sort.**RELEVANCE)
Is the first document in the topdocs collection(Index 0) the document
with
the best score or the worst score?
Sometimes the last match in the collections seems to be the best
match.
Thank you
Björn