We use it as the indexing engine for RavenDB for quite a while now, with high profile customers. Only hiccups we see are related to the spatial contrib, and I'm about to dive into solving it in the upcoming days.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Miller, Bill (QuickWire) < bmil...@quickwire.com> wrote: > I've been using 2.9.4 in production for quite a while now - under high > load, no issues for me. > > Bill Miller, QuickWire Labs > > -----Original Message----- > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 6:10 PM > To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: 2.9.4 source > > From my understanding the community has been very happy with it - > hopefully they can chime in here > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Artem Chereisky > Sent: 4/16/2012 9:41 PM > To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: 2.9.4 source > > I re-ran unit tests a number of times. Here's the results: > > 1. TestFutureCommit() - fails consistently 2. TestLocalDateFormat() - > intermittent - fails sometimes 3. > Lucene.Net.Index.TestStressIndexing2.TestRandomIWReader() - intermittent - > fails sometimes. > 4. I also get this Assertion Failed dialog > > *[image: Inline image 1]* > > My question is, how stable is 2.9.4? Is it used by many? Is it worth > moving over from 2.9.2? > > Regards, > Art > > > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com > >wrote: > > > > > I ran the test suite on 2.9.4, I'm getting only the > > Lucene.Net.Index.TestIndexWriter.TestFutureCommit. The other issue may > > be something that is machine dependant or possible only fails > intermittently. > > Perhaps someone else could run the test suite to confirm? We are > evolving > > our release methodology, and unfortunately we didn't document what > > would fail and why from 2.9.4, so I don't have many more details to > > share. With > > 3.0.3 we plan to either have all tests passing (removing tests that > > are no longer valid) or clear explanations of why they are failing and > > why that's OK. ~Prescott > Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:00:14 +1000 > > > Subject: Re: 2.9.4 source > > > From: a.cherei...@gmail.com > > > To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > I ran unit tests - some failed. Is that expected? > > > > > > Lucene.Net.Index.TestIndexWriter.TestFutureCommit: > > > System.Collections.Generic.KeyNotFoundException : The given key was > > > not present in the dictionary. > > > at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2.get_Item(TKey key) at > > > Lucene.Net.Index.TestIndexWriter.TestFutureCommit() in > > > D:\Develop\Lucene.Net.2.9.4\test\core\Index\TestIndexWriter.cs:line > > > 5969 > > > > > > Lucene.Net.QueryParsers.TestQueryParser.TestLocalDateFormat: > > > Expected: 1 > > > But was: 0 > > > at Lucene.Net.QueryParsers.TestQueryParser.AssertHits(Int32 > > > expected, String query, IndexSearcher is_Renamed) in > > > D:\Develop\Lucene.Net.2.9.4\test\core\QueryParser\TestQueryParser.cs > > > :line > > > 1111 > > > at Lucene.Net.QueryParsers.TestQueryParser.TestLocalDateFormat() in > > > D:\Develop\Lucene.Net.2.9.4\test\core\QueryParser\TestQueryParser.cs > > > :line > > > 996 > > > > > > Regards, > > > Art > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > On 2012-04-12, Artem Chereisky wrote: > > > > > > > > > what is the source control location for 2.9.4? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/Lucene.Net_2 > > _9_4_RC3/ > > > > > > > > The third RC is what finally became 2.9.4. > > > > > > > > Stefan > > > > > > > > >
