Scott, forgive the impromptu nature of this, but couldn't help but notice that 
you guys have a Lucene Directory impl to a SQL Server db.

Would you mind commenting on this stackoverflow topic?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10815206/implement-lucene-on-existing-net-sql-server-stack-with-multiple-webservers

Brad Allan


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Baldwin [mailto:s.bald...@qsr.com.au]
Sent: 31 May 2012 08:13
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene upgrade causes significant slow down

Hi again all, can someone just confirm or deny the possibility that upgrading 
from 2.4.1 to 2.9.2 may cause a significant increase in the size of the index 
when re-indexed?
We are seeing significant index size increases for indexes in some cases (not 
all).

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Svensson [mailto:si...@devhost.se]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 May 2012 10:49 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene upgrade causes significant slow down

Hi,

Export your database-based directory into a normal filesystem (using 
Directory.Copy), and open it in Luke[1]. The Files tab will show what the 
different files are used for, and which ones belong to old commits and can be 
removed.

Have you tried the latest version; 2.9.4?

// Simon

[1] https://code.google.com/p/luke/

On 2012-05-29 12:01, Scott Baldwin wrote:
>
> Hi all, I'm a bit of a newb when it comes to Lucene, but I am in need
> of some sage counsel.
>
> I have an application that uses the Lucene engine to index various
> items. We upgraded to Lucene 2.9.2 and we now find that on a re-index
> of a significantly large project, our index size has doubled (from
> roughly 73MB to 137MB). This causes significant performance issues
> especially as we have written a custom Directory that queries the
> index from a SQL Database instead of a disk file of RAM index.
>
> I was just wondering if anyone knows there would be such a huge
> increase in index size, and if there are any options/settings we might
> be able to change to reduce the size of the index?
>
> Thanks heaps.
>
> Scott Baldwin Technical Architect
>
> *QSR International Pty Ltd*
> 2nd Floor, 651 Doncaster Road |  Doncaster Victoria 3108 Australia T
> +61 3 9840 4934 F +61 3 9840 1500 s.bald...@qsrinternational.com
> <mailto:s.bald...@qsrinternational.com>
> |www.qsrinternational.com <http://www.qsrinternational.com/>
>
> *Please consider the environment before printing this email.*
>
>
>
> Description: cid:image004.png@01CBF452.E35AB7A0
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> *Disclaimer*
> This transmission may contain information which is confidential and
> privileged and intended only for the addressee. If you are not the
> addressee you may not use, disseminate or copy this information. If
> you have received this information in error please notify the sender
> immediately. Thank you.
>

CheckFree Solutions Limited (trading as Fiserv)
Registered Office: Eversheds House, 70 Great Bridgewater Street, Manchester, 
M15 ES
Registered in England: No. 2694333

Reply via email to