I can definitely try that. I just expected QueryParser would respect the
case of the source string. I was hoping to avoid using the Query API
per-se, and just let the parser to the work for me.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Lingam, ChandraMohan J <
chandramohan.j.lin...@intel.com> wrote:
> >> var query = _parser.Parse("Id:BAUER*");
>
> In your code, most likely, the value got converted to lower case (i.e.
> bauer*) by the parse statement.
> Whereas indexed value is in upper case as it is not analyzed (from screen
> shot).
>
> Can you explicitly try using prefix query?
>
>
>
> > Same results, apparently, when I use Luke 1.0.1.
> >
> > When I search for "Id:BAUER*" I get 15 hits in Luke, but in my custom
> > app, zero.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Rob Vesse <rve...@dotnetrdf.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > You appear to be using Luke 3.5 which per the information on the
> > > Luke homepage (http://code.google.com/p/luke/) uses Lucene 3.5
> > >
> > > Since Lucene.Net is currently on 2.9.4 I wouldn't be surprised to
> > > see different behavior between the API and executing in Luke.
> > >
> > > If you use a version of Luke which more closely aligns with the
> > > version
> > of
> > > Lucene.Net (Luke 1.0.1 uses Lucene 3.0.1 which should be close
> > > enough since the 2.9.x releases were previews of the 3.0.x releases
> > > as I understood it) what behavior do you see?
> > >
> > > Hope this helps,
> > >
> > > Rob
> > >
> > > On 6/26/12 10:50 AM, "Rob Cecil" <rob.ce...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >If I run a query against my index using QueryParser to query a field:
> > > >
> > > > var query = _parser.Parse("Id:BAUER*");
> > > > var topDocs = searcher.Search(query, 10);
> > > > Assert.AreEqual(count, topDocs.TotalHits);
> > > >
> > > >I get 0 for my TotalHits, yet in Luke, the same query phrase yields
> > > >15 results, what am I doing wrong? I use the StandardAnalyzer both
> > > >to create the index and to query.
> > > >
> > > >The field is defined as:
> > > >
> > > >new Field("Id", myObject.Id, Field.Store.YES,
> > > >Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED)
> > > >
> > > >and is a string field. The result set back from Luke looks like
> > > >(screencap):
> > > >
> > > >http://screencast.com/t/NooMK2Rf
> > > >
> > > >Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
