oh, Im sorry.. I was searching through an index of about 50.000. I have no deleted entries.
With the files you sent out I got 4 hits, with the old lucene.jar file I got 8. I'll try to investigate further which hits that doesn't show up and why. Venlig hilsen regards, Anders Nielsen -----Original Message----- From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12. november 2001 22:53 To: 'Lucene Users List' Subject: RE: Memory Usage? > From: Anders Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > hmm, I seem to be getting a different number of hits when I > use the files > you sent out. Please provide more information! Is it larger or smaller than before? By how much? What differences show up in the hits? That's a terrible bug report... I think before it may have been possible to get a spurious hit if a query term only occurred in deleted documents. A wildcard query with 40,000 terms might make this sort of thing happen more often, and unless you tried to access the Hits.doc() for such a hit, you would not see an error. If this was in fact a problem, the code I just sent out would have fixed it. So your results may in fact be better. Or there may be a bug in what I sent. Or both! For the cases I have tried I get the same results with and without those changes. Doug -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
