I came across a tutorial which had some details on the static factory Field methods. But none of the factory methods return a Field object with the following settings: Store => false Index => true Tokenize => false
I'm beginning to think this is a bug - that this combination is handled correctly. ----- Original Message ----- From: Emmanuel Bridonneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Lucene Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:12 PM Subject: RE: Attribute Search > Did you check w/FAQ 26 on searching? > http://www.lucene.com/cgi-bin/faq/faqmanager.cgi?file=chapter.search&toc=faq > #q26 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: New, Cecil (GEAE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:19 PM > To: 'Lucene Users List' > Subject: RE: Attribute Search > > > Actually, "last name" is not a good example. Social security numbers, phone > numbers, PO numbers, organization codes, etc. are better examples. > > These fields are not even text. So I did not think it made sense to > tokenize them. But I did want them indexed and searchable. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Emmanuel Bridonneau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:02 PM > To: 'Lucene Users List' > Subject: RE: Attribute Search > > > I am new here too but here's my 2 cents. > If you don't tokenize your db textvalues, what do you say will be the > resulting terms indexed? I think not what you expect. > Your non tokenized fields probably are not filtered out hence a lastname > like 'Smith' will not be a hit if the query is 'smith' the search being case > sensitive. > I last name is "smith B" (middle initial), search on 'smith' won't return > either because not a token. > I suggest you double check your values in your DB especially if DB is case > sensitive. > Does your analyser takes into account the accent if Latin type of locale? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cecil, Paula New [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:47 PM > To: LUCENE Text Search > Subject: Attribute Search > > > I am trying index a set of data, storing only a "primary key". This primary > key I left un-indexed. There is one "text" field, that I indexed and > tokenized. > > The others I neither want to store or tokenized. My reasoning was that "not > tokenizing" would produce the smallest index. The remaining fields were > lastname, firstname, etc. > > However, my queries did not work correctly; never returning any hits. > > I finally gave up and re-indexed with Tokenize set to true on all the > fields. > > Now my queries work. And to my surprise, the index was smaller that when I > did not tokenize. > > I found this a little counter-intuitive. > > Can someone explain this? > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
