Hi,

A few days ago some people discussed query semantics in a thread with the subject 
"Lucene Query Structure" in the developers list.
As I understand, this is not a bug but a feature (someone please correct me if I'm 
wrong). I suggest you to take a look at this
thread (in the archives). I think you'll find some answers that

Regards,

--Daniel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aruna Raghavan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: quinta-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2002 18:58
> To: 'Lucene Users List'
> Subject: RE: Boolean AND query
>
>
> Yes, + and - do work. In our UI, we try to validate the expression user
> entered by using pattern matching. I was trying to simplify this by simply
> using AND/OR and disallowing +/- (as it could be confusing to a user). I
> guess now the question is what causing the AND to fail? Is it a bug?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Calvo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:55 PM
> To: Lucene Users List
> Subject: RE: Boolean AND query
>
>
> > From: Aruna Raghavan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Daniel,
> > Thanks for the response but I am going by the definition of the
> > Syntax in Lucene FAQ:
> <snip>
> >
> > According to the above, AND and OR should work too, right?
>
> I'm afraid not. Have you tried '+' as I've suggested?
>
> --Daniel
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to