Hello, > > There is no tool to detect index corruption, fixing of indexing, > nor > > index rebuilding. > > The last one anyone can/has to do on their own. > > :-( Well, that *very* sad to say the least... How do I know if my > indexes are not corrupted even if everything seems to be working > fine? > Don't tell me I'm the first one to run into this kind of issues?!? > How > can I "trust" an index if there is *no* way of checking its > integrity? > And even if you happen to notice that something is fishy, there is no > > way to rebuild the index -short or re-indexing everything from > scratch? > That does not sound like a very "healthy" situation to me. "Fragile" > will be kind for describing it...
Yes, that's all unfortunate. If you come up with anything, please share it. Or, you can use Lucene Sandbox and develop stuff there. > > I've seen people asking about this on the list, but I never > encountered > > this particular exception. > > Lucky you... :) > > Maybe it's not a Lucene issue then, although I've seen this > mentioned > > so often, which means that documentation could be improved to > prevent > > people from making the same mistakes that others have already made. > > Maybe, maybe not. And most likely I'm doing something odd. In any > case, > could you point me to the "mistakes that others have already made"? > Or > did I miss something obvious here? Nah, the only thing I can suggest is check the lists' archives, that is where mistakes of others would be recorded. Otis __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
